Why Generic Contractor Strategies Fail in STEM | Owen Daniels | Powering Global STEM
Why Generic Contractor Strategies Fail in STEM  |  Owen Daniels  |  Powering Global STEM
22nd September 2025

Why Generic Contractor Strategies Fail in STEM

Share
sc-layer

Engineering and manufacturing contracting is fundamentally more complex than other sectors. The technical expertise required, the regulatory landscape, the project-critical nature of roles, and the competitive talent market all combine to create unique challenges that generic recruitment approaches simply cannot address effectively.

Technical Complexity Demands Specialist Understanding

Generic contractor strategies treat all roles as interchangeable; a mechanical engineer is just another contractor. This surface-level understanding leads to mismatched placements, failed contracts, and frustrated hiring managers.

A control systems engineer working in underwater robotics requires vastly different expertise from one in automotive systems. Generic recruiters lack the technical depth to understand these nuances, resulting in candidates who look good on paper but fail to deliver in practice.

Regulatory and Compliance Complexity

The STEM sector operates within complex regulatory frameworks, from safety standards in manufacturing to compliance requirements in defence contracting. In highly regulated sectors such as Aerospace and Defence, which make up a significant portion of STEM contracting, the consequences for non-compliance extend far beyond financial penalties. Reputational damage in these mission-critical industries can result in lost security clearances, exclusion from future government contracts, and irreparable harm to decades of carefully built industry relationships.

Generic contractor strategies often overlook these critical elements, exposing organisations to significant risks. Our case study with Saab Seaeye, the world leader in electric underwater robotics, perfectly illustrates this challenge. We implemented comprehensive IR35 assessment portals, ensured 100% compliance across all placements, and delivered the expertise needed to navigate their industry's complex regulatory landscape.

Read the full case study here.

Where Generic Strategies Fall Short

Lack of Technical Expertise: Generic agencies cast wide nets through volume rather than precision, relying on keyword matching and missing the subtle technical competencies that distinguish project success from failure.

Poor Understanding of Project Dynamics: STEM contracting is about delivering specific project outcomes within tight timelines. Generic strategies focus on CV matching rather than understanding how contractors integrate into complex technical workflows.

Inadequate Compliance Management: Generic agencies often lack specialist knowledge and systems for full compliance, leaving both contractors and clients exposed to significant financial and legal risks, particularly critical in highly regulated sectors where reputational consequences can be severe and long-lasting.

Our work with clients like Saab Seaeye shows the impact of specialist contractor solutions built for STEM. As recruitment experts with deep STEM knowledge, we understand the technical demands and skills that drive success.

Measurable Results

The numbers speak for themselves. In our first year with Saab Seaeye, we delivered:

  • 45 successful appointments across permanent and contract roles
  • 35% cost saving on total recruitment margin
  • 100% IR35 compliance across all contractor engagements
  • Single point of contact for all external recruitment

Engineering and manufacturing organisations partnering with specialist STEM contractor providers benefit from access to hidden talent pools, reduced time to productivity, comprehensive risk mitigation, and strategic partnerships rather than transactional relationships.

Ready to explore how tailored contractor solutions can transform your STEM recruitment strategy? Get in touch with our team today. 

Share
sc-layer